Scarlett Johansson has accused OpenAI of using a voice eerily similar to hers in its ChatGPT product, sparking a heated debate over the ethics and legality of AI-generated voices.
The controversy has led to the suspension of the voice option and raised questions about the intentions behind its creation. Here’s a comprehensive look at the unfolding drama and its implications for the future of AI and voice acting.
Key Takeaways
- Scarlett Johansson claims OpenAI used a voice similar to hers without permission.
- OpenAI denies the allegations, stating the voice was created by another actress.
- The voice option has been suspended amid the controversy.
- The debate highlights ethical and legal issues in AI-generated content.
The Accusation
Scarlett Johansson, known for her roles in films like Avengers and Her, has publicly accused OpenAI of copying her voice for its ChatGPT product. Johansson stated that she was approached by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman to license her voice for the AI system, but she declined for personal reasons. Despite this, she claims the released voice option, named “Sky,” sounded so similar to hers that even her closest friends couldn’t tell the difference.
The Lab Analysis
A forensic voice analysis conducted by researchers at Arizona State University found that the Sky voice closely resembled Johansson’s voice. The study compared Sky’s voice to those of 600 professional actresses and found Johansson’s voice to be more similar to Sky than 98% of the other actresses. However, the analysis also noted that Sky’s voice had a slightly higher pitch and was more expressive than Johansson’s normal speaking voice.
OpenAI’s Defence
OpenAI has denied the allegations, stating that the Sky voice was created by another actress months before Altman contacted Johansson. The company maintains that the voice was not intended to mimic Johansson’s and that the actress’s natural voice was used to develop Sky. OpenAI has paused the use of Sky’s voice in response to the controversy and has apologised for any confusion caused.
Legal and Ethical Implications
The controversy has sparked a broader discussion about the ethical and legal implications of AI-generated content. Johansson’s claim echoes concerns about the unauthorised use of likenesses and voices in AI products. Legal experts have drawn parallels to past cases, such as Bette Midler’s lawsuit against Ford Motor Co. for using an impersonator after she declined to participate in an ad campaign.
Public Reaction and Industry Impact
The public has largely rallied behind Johansson, with many expressing outrage over the perceived misuse of her voice. The incident has also highlighted the need for clearer regulations and ethical guidelines in the development and use of AI-generated content. Major entertainment unions, such as Sag-Aftra, have been vocal about the potential risks of AI replacing human workers and have called for stricter oversight.
Conclusion
The Scarlett Johansson vs. OpenAI controversy serves as a cautionary tale for the tech industry. It underscores the importance of ethical considerations and clear communication when developing AI products. As AI continues to evolve, it is crucial for companies to navigate the fine line between innovation and respect for individual rights.
Sources
- ChatGPT's voice closely resembles Scarlett Johnasson's, says lab analysis : NPR, NPR.
- OpenAI didn’t copy Scarlett Johansson’s voice for ChatGPT, records show - The Washington Post, Washington Post.
- Scarlett Johansson AI controversy takes turn as agent says another actress was hired for ChatGPT voice: report | Fox News, Fox News.
- ChatGPT suspends Scarlett Johansson-like voice as actor speaks out against OpenAI | ChatGPT | The Guardian, The Guardian.
- Scarlett Johansson, OpenAI, and the sexism of ChatGPT’s “Her” voice - Vox, Vox.
