A recent YouGov survey reveals a stark division in public opinion regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by students for coursework. While the vast majority deem it unacceptable for AI to complete assignments entirely, there is less consensus on its use for improving grammar and punctuation. The findings highlight a broader debate about adapting educational practices to the evolving landscape of AI technology.
Public Divided on AI in Education
A significant 89% of UK adults surveyed believe it is "unacceptable" for pupils to use AI to fully complete their coursework. However, the same poll indicates a more nuanced view when it comes to AI assisting with specific tasks. Nearly half of respondents (46%) found it acceptable for AI to help improve punctuation and grammar, while 44% disagreed.
Key Takeaways:
Overwhelming opposition to AI completing coursework entirely.
Divided opinion on AI for grammar and punctuation assistance.
Majority oppose teachers using AI for marking, but support it for administrative tasks.
Calls for a national strategy to navigate AI in education.
Adapting Coursework for the AI Era
Jill Duffy, chief executive of exam board OCR, emphasised the need for educational institutions to adapt coursework to be "fit for the AI century." She stated that AI is already present in schools and is not going away, underscoring the importance of a coordinated national strategy. This strategy, she believes, should include funding to ensure equitable access and build public confidence in AI's potential. Duffy also suggested that AI could enable the testing of different skills and potentially reduce the volume of exams taken at age 16.
Teacher Use of AI and Future Strategies
The survey also explored public sentiment towards teachers using AI. More than three in five UK adults (62%) oppose teachers using AI to mark coursework, though 27% are in favour. Conversely, a majority (59%) support teachers using AI for administrative tasks like lesson planning. These findings come as an independent curriculum and assessment review considers reducing the overall volume of assessment at GCSE, acknowledging the risks AI poses to standards and fairness in coursework.
Broader Implications for Higher Education
Beyond secondary schools, the debate extends to higher education. A separate survey indicated that half of college students would have used AI tools for their admissions essays if they had been available. This raises questions about fairness and access, with some students believing AI could improve opportunities for underserved populations, while others feel it provides an unfair advantage. The findings suggest a need for clear policies and guidance on AI use across all educational levels to ensure academic integrity and equitable learning experiences.